Discuss
in detail the role of the police in criminal procedure
The police are the state officers with the responsibility
of investigating the crime. However, non-investigative work also consumes much
of the police time. Police officers ask for statements as a record of what
happened after which they commence an investigation. They give a case reference
number for them to follow up on the matter and gather more information and
evidence. After investigations, the police may give summons, arrest, or give
caution to the alleged offender (Bogan & Roberts, 2011).
Discuss
in detail why the impacts of procedural law on law enforcement are
controversial
Procedural law comprises of the means of enforcing rights
and providing redress of the wrongs as guided by the rules of jurisdiction,
pleading, practice, evidence, appeal, execution of judgments, and other
matters. The procedural law affects law enforcement and appears controversial
since it seems to protect the accused person by seeking the help of the court
in enforcing a particular issue (Scheb & Scheb, 2011). The law enforcement
officers conduct their duties accordingly, but the courts, using procedural
law, end up setting the accused persons at liberty through the protection of
certain rules which are controversial to the work of the police.
Discuss
in detail the Fourth Amendment limits placed on search and seizures by the
police
The Fourth Amendment to U.S Constitution protects
personal privacy, against unreasonable government intrusion in their persons,
homes, business, or property. Although people are protected by their privacy
and freedom from intrusion, there is a limit on it. The police are allowed to
search the premises, car, or property as they look for and seize illegal items,
or evidence of a crime if at all it is justified. The police may engage in
reasonable searches and seizures by showing that it was likely that a crime
occurred. The police may also search and seize items without any legitimate
expectation of privacy (Dressler & Thomas, 2013).
References
Bogan
PS. & Roberts A. (2011) Identification:
Investigation, trial and scientific evidence
Dressler,
J., & Thomas, G. C. (2013). Criminal
procedure: Principles, policies, and perspectives.
Scheb,
J. M., & Scheb, J. M. (2011). Criminal
law and procedure. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment